<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lax Advances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Peanut Gallery of Navy Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:47:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thebirddog</title>
		<link>http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator>thebirddog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/?p=491#comment-1986</guid>
		<description>Were you happy with the football team’s defense? We won games, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were you happy with the football team’s defense? We won games, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave'69</title>
		<link>http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave'69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/?p=491#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just paraphrasizing something I was taught about 39 years ago - &quot;There is no arguing with the irrefutable logic of success!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just paraphrasizing something I was taught about 39 years ago &#8211; &#8220;There is no arguing with the irrefutable logic of success!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebirddog</title>
		<link>http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>thebirddog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/?p=491#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>That isn&#039;t even close to being true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That isn&#8217;t even close to being true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave'69</title>
		<link>http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave'69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/?p=491#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>TBD - If you begin the 4th quarter with a comfortable lead, and end the the quarter winning the game, your plan has worked.  If you end up losing the game, your plan has failed.  Everything else is just sports talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TBD &#8211; If you begin the 4th quarter with a comfortable lead, and end the the quarter winning the game, your plan has worked.  If you end up losing the game, your plan has failed.  Everything else is just sports talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebirddog</title>
		<link>http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator>thebirddog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/?p=491#comment-1975</guid>
		<description>randyrad, if you begin the 4th quarter with a comfortable lead, and end the 4th quarter in position to give up that lead, then your plan has failed. Anything else is just spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>randyrad, if you begin the 4th quarter with a comfortable lead, and end the 4th quarter in position to give up that lead, then your plan has failed. Anything else is just spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randyrad</title>
		<link>http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>randyrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/?p=491#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>Absolutey,  we could play stall better - we could do everything on offense better. Then maybe we wouldn&#039;t have to resort to stallball. It&#039;s about minimizing the impact of your limitations.

Huge lead ? A 3-1 4th qtr ratio is acceptable when you enter the qtr with a 3 goal lead. It&#039;s like playing the hated prevent D to give up FG&#039;s or time consuming  TD drive&#039;s rather than quick strike TD&#039;s.

It&#039;s not fun to watch &amp; nobody likes it particularly (Coaches included), but sometimes it&#039;s what you gotta do to give your team the best % of winning.
Winning Ugly, I believe it&#039;s called.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutey,  we could play stall better &#8211; we could do everything on offense better. Then maybe we wouldn&#8217;t have to resort to stallball. It&#8217;s about minimizing the impact of your limitations.</p>
<p>Huge lead ? A 3-1 4th qtr ratio is acceptable when you enter the qtr with a 3 goal lead. It&#8217;s like playing the hated prevent D to give up FG&#8217;s or time consuming  TD drive&#8217;s rather than quick strike TD&#8217;s.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not fun to watch &amp; nobody likes it particularly (Coaches included), but sometimes it&#8217;s what you gotta do to give your team the best % of winning.<br />
Winning Ugly, I believe it&#8217;s called.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navyblue12</title>
		<link>http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>Navyblue12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/?p=491#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>Randy,

Do you agree with Long that we could play the stall better?  Or, is he wrong also?

With our offense, a 3-1 ratio, while in the stall is not good, unless we have a huge lead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy,</p>
<p>Do you agree with Long that we could play the stall better?  Or, is he wrong also?</p>
<p>With our offense, a 3-1 ratio, while in the stall is not good, unless we have a huge lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebirddog</title>
		<link>http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator>thebirddog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/?p=491#comment-1971</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think we&#039;re even talking about the same thing anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re even talking about the same thing anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randyrad</title>
		<link>http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/#comment-1970</link>
		<dc:creator>randyrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/?p=491#comment-1970</guid>
		<description>Given this team&#039;s limitations, I think it does, &amp; I&#039;m not anxious to dissect those limitations in an open forum.
capiche ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given this team&#8217;s limitations, I think it does, &amp; I&#8217;m not anxious to dissect those limitations in an open forum.<br />
capiche ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebirddog</title>
		<link>http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lax-advances/#comment-1969</link>
		<dc:creator>thebirddog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/?p=491#comment-1969</guid>
		<description>That makes no sense, randy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes no sense, randy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
